09-02-2016, 12:54 AM
Here is a particularly telling graph from policies that work:
![[Image: x123.gif.pagespeed.ic.RGO6PN_Llv.webp]](http://politicsthatwork.com/img/x123.gif.pagespeed.ic.RGO6PN_Llv.webp)
The data come from the OECD and The World Bank.
What you see on the horizontal axis is income inequality, that is, the inverse of the Gini coefficient. A lower score means more unequal income distribution.
The vertical axis is 'equality of opportunity,' measured as income mobility, the extent to which your income differs from the income of your father. The higher the score, the less correlation there is, which suggest greater equality of opportunity.
What you see is that the US scores worst on both, while the Nordic counties do much better. The US is no longer the land of opportunity.
![[Image: x123.gif.pagespeed.ic.RGO6PN_Llv.webp]](http://politicsthatwork.com/img/x123.gif.pagespeed.ic.RGO6PN_Llv.webp)
The data come from the OECD and The World Bank.
What you see on the horizontal axis is income inequality, that is, the inverse of the Gini coefficient. A lower score means more unequal income distribution.
The vertical axis is 'equality of opportunity,' measured as income mobility, the extent to which your income differs from the income of your father. The higher the score, the less correlation there is, which suggest greater equality of opportunity.
What you see is that the US scores worst on both, while the Nordic counties do much better. The US is no longer the land of opportunity.

