05-07-2016, 08:55 PM
After this happened:
What does this say of the market fundamentalist preferred model of economic growth, trickle-down economics? Why give enormous tax brakes to those in the upper brackets when this so clearly hasn't worked in the past?
Why do all Republican candidates for the Presidency still insist on this?
Quote:The view over a longer timeline provides no more comfort. The median income in this country hasn’t risen at all in real terms for 40 years. The United States since most of us were born has regularly harvested more wealth than any other nation in the history of the world, but the fruits have been increasingly carried toward the tip of the pyramid. While income in the middle brackets stagnated over the past four decades, income for the upper 1% tripled. As recently as the middle of the 20th century, the share of the United States’ national income taken by the top 10% of income earners was about one-third. Now it is more like 50%. The fortunate pinnacle, the top 1% of all households, received 10% of the nation’s total income in the middle of the 20th century. Now the upper 1% takes about one-quarter of the grand total. If you are in this segment, I hope you can be grateful without believing that this is the way things ought to be.Is the American Dream Dying? - Knowledge@Wharton
What does this say of the market fundamentalist preferred model of economic growth, trickle-down economics? Why give enormous tax brakes to those in the upper brackets when this so clearly hasn't worked in the past?
Why do all Republican candidates for the Presidency still insist on this?