![]() |
|
Loose-loose combination? - Printable Version +- Forums (http://rightwingers.org/forums) +-- Forum: Politics and Policies (http://rightwingers.org/forums/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: The Republican Party (http://rightwingers.org/forums/forum-18.html) +--- Thread: Loose-loose combination? (/thread-1296.html) |
Loose-loose combination? - Admin - 07-19-2016 TNR has an article arguing that the Republican party has gotten it backwards, doubling down on the traditional Republican platform based on the culture wars, combined with Trump's more radical ideas like building a wall: Quote:Trump is racist and demagogic, but he’s also secular and focused on workers, not the Wall Street tycoons and religious right that have driven Republican policy for the past three decades. In that spirit, Trump dialed back on Republican nostrums like the opposition to abortion and gay marriage, and struck a cautious tone on military intervention. That he won the primary by opposing party orthodoxy essentially obliterated the assumption that ideological conservatives were a majority faction within the GOP...The Republican Party Blew It | New Republic They should have done it backwards, adopting Trump's more moderate position on the culture wars (and, we argue, his moderate position on social security and medicare, which are popular at the base) but stressed the party's traditional platforms of open trade and engagement with the world. RE: Loose-loose combination? - Martin K - 07-19-2016 So are you saying that they picked the worst part of Trump and the worst part of the traditional Republican platform, whilst they should have done the opposite? But what are those 'worst' parts? The Trump worst part are actually rather popular! RE: Loose-loose combination? - Admin - 07-19-2016 Actually, you have a point there, Martin. There are fairly unpopular positions in the traditional Republican platform, such as the scaling down of the welfare state (Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare). The soul searching after the 2012 loss pointing towards a more inclusive party (because of changing values and demographics), which resulted in the attempts to reform immigration have quickly been forgotten. In fact, Trump can be seen as a reaction to this. On the other hand, Trump isn't much of a culture warrior, nor a religious fundamentalist. So basically Trump has forged a new electorate which is rejection part of the 'broader appeal' post 2012 diagnosis (the part against Muslims and immigration), but passively embracing others. He departs from traditional Republican positions on trade and the welfare state, which were never very popular with the constituencies in the first place. |